Intro
The Local Government Amendment Bill 2024 (the Bill) proposes to change the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) to provide for various reforms, including the establishment of a new Local Government Inspector (the Inspector) and monitors that can provide for early intervention and assist local governments in resolving dysfunction.
In addition to the reforms for the Inspector, a range of other second tranche reforms are being introduced that focus on good governance and decision-making at council and committee meetings:
The role of councils is to lead and represent their communities. Councils do so by engaging with their community, making decisions and setting the strategic direction of a local government. The administrative arm of the local government is responsible for implementing decisions and plans made by council.
The roles of the council, mayors or presidents, council members and the CEO have been further clarified in the second tranche of reforms. These changes ensure there is a clear distinction between the functions and responsibilities of a council and a CEO.
All council members are expected to:
As the leader of the local government council, mayors or presidents perform the following roles in addition to their council member role:
The CEO is responsible for the administration and operation of the local government, including:
The CEO liaises with the mayor or president on the local government’s affairs and performance of its functions and may speak on behalf of the local government, with the mayor or president’s agreement.
Role clarity is vital when different roles work to achieve the same objectives. When people understand their roles, better decisions can be made and implemented more effectively, resulting in improved use of ratepayer funds.
As a minor reform, local governments will now be required to advise the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries (DLGSC) when vacancies on the council arise.
By default, under the reforms, council and committee meetings must be open to the public. In certain circumstances, part of a meeting may be closed to deal with specific information where there is a clear public interest for that information to remain confidential.
The reforms provide a much stronger definition of the limited reasons to close a meeting.
Matters where a meeting must be closed include:
Examples of the types of information to be considered that may provide a basis for closing part of a meeting include:
The reforms clarify that:
The Bill also contains a new section to define irrelevant reasons for closing part of a meeting. These include:
The new Inspector will be able to review a decision to close part of a meeting to the public.
From 1 January 2025, all local governments will be required to audio record parts of a meeting that are closed to the public. Additionally, as proposed in the Bill’s reforms, the Inspector will be able to order that the local government release the audio recording to the public if the Inspector determines that the meeting was not closed in accordance with the Act or regulations.
Audit committees will be revised as audit, risk and improvement committees (ARICs). ARICs must have an independent presiding member to ensure a level of neutrality and impartial oversight in chairing these meetings. An independent presiding member must be a person who is not a council member of a local government or an employee of the local government. If a deputy presiding member is appointed, they must also be independent.
The introduction of an independent presiding member provides an opportunity for increased community confidence in a local government’s financial and risk management. Local government operations may also benefit through appointing an independent chair with risk and financial management expertise that may otherwise be unavailable.
This reform reflects modern governance practices in State Government authorities and agencies as well as private corporations.
In relation to the current Act, an audit committee is required to be established comprising 3 or more persons appointed by absolute majority by a local government. Most of the members must be council members. The CEO or a local government employee cannot be a member.
The new audit, risk and improvement committee comprises the following roles, with a total of 3 or more members.
Under the proposed amendments in the Bill, an ARIC now requires an independent presiding member. A local government can choose to appoint an independent deputy presiding member to chair the meeting if the independent presiding member is unable to do so.
If a local government chooses not to nominate a deputy presiding member, the council will need to appoint an independent proxy to chair the meeting should the need arise.
Smaller local governments may also now choose to share an ARIC to reduce the burden on their resources.
The BIll includes changes to allow for greater transparency and clarity on how council committees operate.
Council can now establish committees that have either an advisory or decision-making function and are generally open to the public.
The appointment process for the presiding member and deputy presiding member has also been simplified. Councils will appoint these roles, instead of the committee electing those roles by secret ballot.
Local governments are still able to establish informal working groups, which are not committees, to engage with their community or develop ongoing networks.
Contact DLGSC via email actreview@dlgsc.wa.gov.au